CO129-275 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [1-5] — Page 515

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

507

Enclosure

Report by the Attorney General.

"The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850.

Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance.

Page 507 appears to be properly formatted with minimal OCR errors. However, some minor corrections were made to improve readability.

Here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:

Enclosure
Report by the Attorney General.
"The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850.
Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance.

becomes

507

Enclosure

Report by the Attorney General.

"The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850.

Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance.

becomes the final output after removing the extra texts not in original content. The final output is

507

Enclosure

Report by the Attorney General.

"The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850.

Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance.

Edit History

2026-05-28 18:41:53 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
507 Enclosure Report by the Attorney General. "The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850. Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance. Page 507 appears to be properly formatted with minimal OCR errors. However, some minor corrections were made to improve readability. Here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested: Enclosure Report by the Attorney General. "The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850. Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance. becomes 507 Enclosure Report by the Attorney General. "The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850. Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance. becomes the final output after removing the extra texts not in original content. The final output is 507 Enclosure Report by the Attorney General. "The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by no means, a new one. Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier days of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858, a further Ordinance No. 2 of 1871 was passed rendering Ordinance No. 2 of 1850 applicable to proceedings for rendition under the 21st Article of the Extradition Treaty as if that Treaty had been expressly mentioned among the Treaties referred to in the preamble of Ordinance No. 2 of 1850. Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however repealed by Section 2 of the Chinese Extradition Ordinance.
Baseline (Original)
: $ 507 l Enclosure Report by the Attorney General. . "The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by means, to new one. Ordinance t. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier day of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858 a further Ordinance No 2 of 1891 was passed rendering Ardi- -nance A: 2 of 1850 as applicable to pro- -ceedings for rendition under the 21th Article of the Exenton - Treaty Treaty had been. est expressley and included an ferred to in the. 2 of 1850. as if that mentioned mong the Treaties ro= Le preamble of Ordinanc Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however re- - peated by lechon 2 of the Chriese Estradition. 1
2026-05-28 18:41:53 · Baseline
View content

:

$

507

l

Enclosure

Report by the Attorney General.

. "The question of rendition of Chinese accused of offences is, by

means, to new one. Ordinance t. 2 of 1850 dealt with it, in the earlier day

of the Colony, under the then existing Treaties. After the Treaty of Tientsin of the 26th June 1858 a further Ordinance No 2 of 1891 was passed rendering

Ardi- -nance A: 2 of 1850 as applicable to pro- -ceedings for rendition under the 21th Article of the Exenton - Treaty

Treaty had been.

est

expressley

and included an

ferred to in the.

2 of 1850.

as if that

mentioned

mong the Treaties ro=

Le preamble of Ordinanc

Both Ordinance 2 of 1850 and

Ordinance 2 of 1871 were however re-

- peated by lechon 2 of the Chriese

Estradition.

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.